Skip to main content

Breaking Changes? Don't!

Sometimes other developers give me a funny look when I spend extra time decoupling code, or adding some extra configuration.  I explain to them that it allows for future changes to be easier, and they agree, but sometimes I get push-back and it just doesn't seem worth it to them.  So here's some perspective.

I have a confession to make: I hate python.  I can't stand it.  I haven't always been this way about it though, particularly, the things I hear about it on XKCD consistently make me take another look at it time and again.  The problem is, every time I go to look up some basic tutorials, I plug them into the interpreter and they break.  Even Hello World!

Why?  Because the makers of Python accepted a major breaking change into their code base after the language started to get popular.  In my personal opinion, if you make changes to your language that break a hello world tutorial, then your language can't be trusted long enough for me to spend time learning it.

That's not to say that all breaking changes are bad. Eric Lippert discussed a breaking change in C# 5 that's coming that is perfectly reasonable, and it will affect a large amount of code, as it involves the extremely useful foreach loop.  Yet the breaking change was behind the scenes, inside of a black box to most coders.  The only people that will notice it, are the ones who've been working with the language so long, and so deeply, that they're watching for these things anyway.

Python did it wrong.  The change they made is on the surface.  It's visible to every user every day.  It breaks almost every application written.  It's big, and ugly, and they either didn't consider the consequences, or they were too eager to get the language out there to prepare for this sort of thing ahead of time.

Look, I'm not perfect.  I don't write code that will never have to encounter a breaking change.  I try to keep from having to have breaking changes with good practices, but no one solution is perfect.  When we encounter a change, there's a reason we have change committees, and red tape and paperwork.  It's to ensure we keep things working as expected.  If the change is breaking, spend some extra time to do research.  How much of the code base does it affect?  How often is the broken code used?  How many old programs is it likely to affect?  If we don't consider these options, then who knows what you might run into, and that's why you plan ahead.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to identify a skilled programmer during an interview

How does one identify a skilled programmer?  No company that has interviewed me could tell the difference between myself and other programmers they'd interview.  The interview process is truly a game of luck in this industry--on both sides.  Both the programmer and the company are basing their actions entirely on luck.

Companies have come up with numerous methods to attempt to discern a good programmer from a bad one.  The best tricks they have include a series of math problems, algorithms, problem solving technique tests, and even obscure programming questions, some without definitive answers.  As an example: Is there an authoritative source of information on the core principles that define object oriented programming?  I've heard everywhere from 3 to 7.  In a field of research about a synthetic concept, an authoritative answer is almost impossible to obtain.

Programmers were then forced to study to the interview.  Careercup is one of my favorite sites for this.  This almost …

When Is Software Done?

I have some very exciting news.  A piece of software I've been working on for over 2 years is released to the general public!  This is a little exciting if it were software I'd been working on for some big company.  It's very exciting because it's software I have been working on for my company.  That's right!  My company is ready to start selling software and start making money!

I'm not gonna use this blog post to talk about my company and what it does.  You can read about that in our press release.  Instead, I'm going to talk about the software industry and the concept of done.  Because, as with everything, it's more complicated than it seems.

Software is never really done
Actually that's a misnomer.  Software can really be done.  But done is sort of a quantum state--there and not there at the same time.  First and foremost, anyone can understand that software that works is complete.  If the software's purpose is to process a credit card, if th…

Managing Programmers

Working with other programmers is tricky.  That said, it's nothing compared to the job of managing programmers.  One of my favorite quotes about Perl is that (paraphrased) "a Perl developer is like a rockstar.  Now imaging having a bunch of rockstars in one room together and you will understand why you don't want an entire team of Perl developers."  It's not about Perl here though. What's important to understand is that any developer worth his salt is going to be like a rockstar.  And yes, there are a lot of professional developers out there who aren't worth their salt, but that's for another post another day.  Rockstar may not be the right term here, but think of it this way.  These guys are smart.  They may not be geniuses, but there's going to be things that they know that you don't and probably never will.

I've seen it more than once and it's not going to make some Product Managers happy, but I'm going to state a fact, an eleph…